Monday July 21, 2003
|
Vanity Foul Dedicated to the wanderings of an egotistical mind. |
|
Re: OPL I know what OPML is, but what is OPL? OPM is Other Peoples Money, and OPT is Other Peoples Time. So is OPL Other Peoples Laundry? Would seem to fit with the title OPL Over the Air: airing other people's laundry. No? OSCache 2.0 (beta 1) Via David Czarnecki, a new version of OSCache is released. I think the current version of OSCache is responsible for some of the problems on FreeRoller (esp. Rickard's "my page is blank" problem). When I get a chance I'll work on getting OSCache 2 (beta) into Roller (looks like some code changes will be necessary). Where's Russell? He hasn't posted since Tuesday! Re: LGPL and the FSF Kevin, thanks for posting that excerpt from the Slashdot thread. I was going to do it, but lethargy stole over me, after a day of considering and discussing the LGPL. I'm relieved to see that the LGPL makes it possible for Roller to continue with an Apache-style license (though I'm curious what the requirement Make available the source code for the LGPL library entails). Re: Roller Annoyances As Dave says
I would add: If you find any annoyances, please log them in our bug database (but please check first to avoid duplicates). And if you have the solution, please send us a patch! It's not about who wins its about having a discussion, and trying to plumb the exact meaning of in-exact text. I thought we all valued calm discourse, supported by facts (and where absent, quotes). No histrionics, and no temper tantrums. More on Roller and the LGPL If Paul Rivers is right (and I suspect he is, though I'd like to hear someone from the FSF clarify), then Roller has no worries. This also means that we can add back in the old mySQL JDBC driver (the 2.0xxx version) which was LGPL. The newer drivers (3.x) are GPL, which is still "right out" so far as I can tell. Later: Andy made available the entire email which makes the whole brouhaha moot, so far as I can see. Re: Roller and GPL With this news, a follow up to my earlier "survey" seemed in order... LGPL libraries used by Roller
Couldn't tell...
Most of the rest where covered by Apache(like) licenses, with the exception of JUnit which is under IBM's Common Public License. The upshot, as I understand it, is that any Roller code that imports LGPL'd code ( In the discussion at Dave's and Andy's sites, there continues to be questions about what constitutes "linking". Quoting Dave Turner (licensing@fsf.org) from Andy Oliver's email:
Once again Andy has received too vague a response from the FSF. Mr. Turner simply states that 'linking to a jar' falls under Section 6. Paul Rivers points out that Section 6 allows for some exceptions. I read the GPL license some time ago, but I'm pretty certain my brain was mush by the time I got that far (did I get that far?). What exactly is it that we need to do, Paul?
|
|
||||||